A Tribute
The San Francisco International Film Festival and Pacific Film Archive’s film series became one of the most awaited events of the year for the Iranian American community in the Bay Area in the ’90s. Having lived through the absence of reports from Iran except for the state-controlled, sanctioned news, we were eager to find ways of reconnecting to the country that had transformed itself into an Islamic state since the 1979 revolution. The films that were circulating through the international festivals in the ’90s became the only alternative vision of Iran allowed by the government to cross borders, exhibiting a more poetic side of Iranian culture, while hinting at a shift in the politics of the country.
The films of Abbas Kiarostami Where Is Friend’s Home (1987; SFIFF ’94 and 2000), Life and Nothing More (’92; SFIFF ’93), and Through the Olive Trees (’94; SFIFF ’95) — what became known as the Koker trilogy — portrayed a layer of Iran that had remained untouched by politics. Created as tributes to the preciousness of life, the films shifted the focus to the everyday and the mundane. Floating between reality and fiction, they explored universal concepts such as innocence, courage, desire, belief.
Other films followed, making the international festival circuits and acquiring major awards, including Mohsen Makhmalbaf’s Salam Cinema (1994) and A Moment of Innocence (’96; SFIFF ’97), Jafar Panahi’s White Balloon (’95) and The Circle (2000; SFIFF ’01), Rakhshan Bani Etemad’s Nargess (’92), and Bahman Ghobadi’s A Time for Drunken Horses (2000). The trend continued through the presidency of the reformist president Mohammad Khatami (1997–2005), and along with it boycotts and demonstrations around the screenings, pointing to the propagandistic goals of the films as new ambassadors of Iran. Most of the community, however, were supportive of the attempts at diplomacy through film, music, and culture, and believed in supporting the creative energy in Iran and its visibility and outreach outside the country.
Film production in Iran has experienced a drastic shift in recent years, with a much heavier controlling grip by the government on production and distribution. Frustrated by the constant struggle to pass through the multitiered approvals required for production by the Ministry of Ershad, many filmmakers have stopped working in Iran, while others who have persisted have been battling censorship, arrest, and imprisonment. The Iranian films that are screened at the international film festivals have been increasingly produced outside the country. The two Iranian entries at this year’s SFIFF, for instance, are Green Wave by Ali Samadi Ahadi, a documentary that uses animation, interviews as well as twiter/facebook/Youtube postings to recount the aftermath of the 2009 Iranian elections; and the 2010 Audience Award recipient at Sundance, Circumstance, by Iranian American Maryam Keshavarz. A love story between two Iranian teenage girls, the film would have never been able to come to be in a country like Iran.
Cannes Film Festival just announced that Jafar Panahi will be awarded the Carrosse d’Or prize for courage at this year’s festival in May. Panahi, an outspoken supporter of Iran’s opposition green movement, was convicted of “assembly, collusion, and propagandizing” against the regime in December 2010 and sentenced to six years in prison with 20 years ban on creativity of any kind or contact with the media. Mohammad Rasoulof, director of The White Meadows (2009; SFIFF ’10) and Iron Island (2005; SFIFF ’06), who was arrested along with Panahi, also received a six-year prison sentence. Panahi’s Offside (2006) — which screened at “Iran Beyond Censorship,” a tribute to Panahi at YBCA in March — will be shown at the award ceremonies at Cannes. Meanwhile, the controversial Iranian film Outcasts 3 by Masoud Dehnamaki, which ridicules the rivals of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the disputed 2009 election, will be offered as part of the Cannes Film Market this year.
Comments (2)
thanks for your comment Chris– unfortunately I don’t know the exact two films you were mentioning, but in my research for the post, I counted over 120 screenings of Iranian films alone in the Bay Area between 1990-2001. That’s in contrast to the absolute silence before then- and the limitations that the filmmakers-and artists- are facing now.
Not realizing just how important it was, I often went to the film festival when I lived in San Francisco. I was well aware of Werner Herzog and the French New Wave and Cinéma vérité, etc. but in a sense those kinds of films were very different. For many years Herzog was among the few who could make gritty autobiographical films and have them seen.
But the films in the festival from Algeria, Iran, and the middle east really took my breath away. people were risking their lives to tell the stories of women, of the oppressed, or even just the stories of what it means to be from those places. It struck me as all the more daring because the filmmakers must have known how few people would actually get to see their films. In fact I don’t even remember the names of many of the films but the images haunt me because each one seemed like a message in a bottle thrown out into the sea hoping someone would receive it some day.
Somone will know these: One film was a woman who concealed a camera beneath her burka and narrated the events of her day as she went about. It looked pretty rough and abstract, yet rang true. It also had the character of poetry but the expression itself seemed so important and forbidden. That filmmaker didn’t need a steady cam or a multi million dollar production to convey the urgency of her narrative.
Another was a film about the party culture in Iran where women could dress up and wear make up, etc, indoors and then it was contrasted with how appearances must be maintained when in public and all if the inherent contradictions of that. There were many other films that struck me as having been smuggled out of somewhere and I thought how that was real film making!
Of course, Mohsen Makhmalbaf’s Kandahar was also part of that. I actually saw it in Paris in 2001 and when I came back to SF. it was playing. That film seemed to be a microcosm of all of the issues that were in the air right after 9/11, and to a large degree, are still lingering. The main issues being of course, loss and longing.